My son and daughter go to a great school. We bought our house based upon that
fact. The teachers are thoughtful and
the administration is progressive and responsive to the needs of the
community. But a recent testing error
nearly cost my son a place in the gifted program.
As last year drew to a close we were informed that many of
the students in my son’s 2nd grade class had received unusually low
scores on the MAP test. We were assured
that the students would be retested, the error corrected in their records and
there would be no other adverse effects. No answer was given as to why so many students had anomalous scores and I never really felt that there needed to be. It happens.
Yet meanwhile in the background, the bureaucracy was rolling
along and the placement for the gifted programs in the district had begun.
There decisions were based upon test scores and teacher recommendations. Yet
when we called to ask how the situation would affect his placement we were told
we would have to wait for a retest. Placements
were made and no spots remained in the program.
Done.
When summer came we called the district to ask what would
happen when school resumed. We were told
that the person responsible for testing was a ten month employee and would not
return until the start of school. I was growing
concerned.
The school year began we hadn’t heard from the district, but
we were contacted by his new 3rd grade teacher and his teacher from
the previous year. The two had talked and they were pushing for him to be
retested and his placement reviewed. The heroes of this story are the teachers
who applied this internal pressure on the district. The testing took place and three weeks into
the year, my son was placed into an accelerated math course. While he qualified for other courses, no
space was available.
As the year progressed, he has been moved into two other
accelerated courses as space became
available and he is, for the first time, loving school. On his last self-evaluation he is most happy
with math because it is so fun and that he likes school a lot this year. Things
worked out, for him.
Of the other students in his class, none made it into the
gifted program. I wonder how this has affected them? I wonder what might have happened if we never
heard about the testing error or if I hadn’t been a teacher aware of how to
navigate school bureaucracy. I wonder what would have happened if his teacher
hadn’t known him (better than any test could) enough to know that the score was
wrong. I wonder why no one else questioned
how his reading and math level appeared to drop by 3 full grades. But for this placement would anyone have
noticed?
So as it stands my son is in ¾ of the classes that comprise the
gifted program. He is in his same
classroom but travels to another teacher frequently throughout the day. He is really happy, happier than in past
years. The whole situation came about because for a moment in time he was
reduced to a number, one that just happened to be completely wrong.
When a school system only identifies giftedness by a MAP score, that's a problem. What about teacher input--the teacher who sees the child day after day? What does it say about a system that disregards that input in favor of a test score?
ReplyDeleteThis is usually what happens when someone with a big comfy chair feels the need to justify decisions to higher-ups: They default to test scores.
We had a similar situation with our daughter. One year she had high test scores but her teacher only followed the test scores when giving recommendations. (I know.) The next year her test scores dropped off a little (yes, that previous teacher was a peach), but her current teacher gave her high recommendations.
In both years, she missed out on gifted placement but for completely opposite reasons each year.
And we're supposed to take these processes seriously?
Gary